Connect with us

BUSINESS

Bitcoin Price Squeeze Reloads Leverage After the $85,000 Wall

Bitcoin tagged $86,857 after an $85,000 wall cleared, but IBIT-only ETF flows and a larger long-liquidation pile under $82,061 cap the break.

Published

on

Bitcoin tagged $86,857 on Bitstamp on Friday, Oct. 2, its highest print since Sept. 23, then slipped back below $86,000. The 24-hour gain ran about 4%, and CoinGlass counted $122 million of bitcoin short liquidations as the $85,000 sell wall finally gave way.

The forced covering is the easy part of the tape. Futures open interest still rose by $2.3 billion, spot ETF demand was an IBIT rotation rather than a broad bid, and CoinGlass still shows more than twice as much long-liquidation fuel under $82,061 as short fuel above $90,338.

Bitcoin Cleared $85,000 Then Reloaded the Futures Book

Glassnode had watched a stack of sell orders around $85,000 pin the market for almost a week. Buyers took that wall out on Thursday. The analytics firm said the rest of the asks looked withdrawn, which left less supply overhead and a faster path if demand held.

On Friday it updated the map. Price had reached the next cluster of sell orders around $87,000, a stack it described as about half the size of the old wall. That is a thinner ceiling. It is also a weaker magnet. Once a wall is gone, squeeze traders lose the level that was pulling them in.

The sell wall over $BTC has gone. Buyers took out the $85k wall yesterday, after almost a week of failed tests. The rest of the sell orders seem to have been removed. With reduced ask liquidity above, this should allow price to move up faster.

Glassnode, Oct. 1 post

On-chain analyst Willy Woo put the same book in plainer terms, writing that there were plenty of buys below price action and not many sells above. The catch sits in the futures book that filled in behind the breakout. CoinGlass data put bitcoin futures and perpetual open interest near 653,000 BTC, or $56.2 billion, up from 626,000 BTC on Sept. 30, a $2.3 billion jump in two sessions.

That is 27,000 BTC of fresh leverage on a move that had just liquidated the other side. Cross-crypto liquidations over 24 hours ran to $210 million. In one hour on Binance, Bybit, and OKX, shorts of $45.96 million were closed against $10,000 of longs, a three-exchange slice that shows how one-sided the squeeze was while it lasted.

THE WEEK THAT BUILT THE SQUEEZE

  1. Sept. 16: The Federal Open Market Committee raises the funds range to 3.75% to 4.00%, its first increase since 2023.
  2. Sept. 23: Bitcoin prints the high that Friday later reclaims.
  3. Sept. 24: Glassnode flags a sell wall between $85,000 and $85,500 on Binance that then triples in size.
  4. Sept. 29: New York Fed President John C. Williams, speaking at the University at Buffalo, says there is no need for urgency after the September hike.
  5. Sept. 30: Spot bitcoin ETFs post $148.7 million of net outflows, ending a nine-day streak, as August PCE comes in below forecasts.
  6. Oct. 1: Glassnode says the $85,000 wall is gone; the SEC proposes crypto custody rules; ETFs flip back to $102.7 million of net inflows.
  7. Oct. 2: Bitcoin tags $86,857, shorts are forced in, and the September jobs report knocks October hike odds down again.

The sequence reads like a clean break. The open-interest line says traders used the break to put risk back on, not to step aside.

BlackRock’s IBIT Took In $195.6 Million as Others Redeemed

US spot bitcoin ETFs did return to net inflows on Oct. 1, and that fact is already being used as proof of a fresh institutional bid. The spot Bitcoin ETF flow table from Farside Investors shows a narrower story. The complex took in $102.7 million net because BlackRock’s IBIT absorbed $195.6 million while most of the rest of the shelf went the other way.

OCT. 1 SPOT BITCOIN ETF FLOWS

Fund Issuer Net flow ($ million)
IBIT BlackRock 195.6
BTC (Mini Trust) Grayscale 14.6
MSBT Morgan Stanley 7.0
FBTC Fidelity -60.7
GBTC Grayscale -31.4
ARKB Ark 21Shares -7.7
BITB Bitwise -6.9
BTCO Invesco -4.2
HODL VanEck -3.6
Complex total 102.7

Inflows of $217.2 million against redemptions of $114.5 million is how that $102.7 million net is built. Fidelity’s FBTC, Grayscale’s GBTC, Ark 21Shares’ ARKB, Bitwise’s BITB, Invesco’s BTCO, and VanEck’s HODL all lost cash on the same day IBIT was taking it in.

The day before was worse. On Sept. 30 the same products lost $148.7 million net, with FBTC alone down $125.6 million, snapping nine sessions that had brought in about $3.08 billion. September still finished at $2.65 billion, second this year behind August’s $3.52 billion. Lifetime net flows sit at $57.7 billion, about $5 billion short of the $62.8 billion peak on Oct. 10, 2025. Calendar 2026 is only about $930 million in the black after a long stretch underwater.

Around $86,000 is also the aggregate breakeven zone for investors in those US funds. Friday’s high poked that line and then failed to hold it. Glassnode has already said a stronger ETF bid would be the confirmation that the uptrend has support beyond an order-book vacuum. One IBIT-heavy session after an outflow day is not that bid.

Williams Told Buffalo There Is Time to Wait

The macro bid is a postponed hike, not a pivot. After the Sept. 16 increase, Williams told an audience at the University at Buffalo that the September move bought the committee time, and that one more upward adjustment late this year may still fit his forecast if the economy tracks it.

With the policy action we took at our September meeting, there is no need for urgency, and we have time to gather more information. The accumulation of more data should provide greater clarity on the underlying trends in the economy and the associated risks to achieving our goals, and thereby the appropriate setting of monetary policy.

John C. Williams, President, Federal Reserve Bank of New York, University at Buffalo, Sept. 29, 2026

He still expects inflation around 3.5% this year, then a slower glide toward 2% by 2028, with unemployment near 4% next year. That is a pause speech with a hike still in the staff path. Fed Vice Chair Philip Jefferson, speaking on Thursday, said officials may want more time before raising rates again, while repeating that inflation has stayed too high, citing energy, tariffs, and AI-related demand.

Bitcoin had already spent late September absorbing an 86.5% Fed hike bet near $77,643. The Buffalo remarks took October off autopilot. They did not take December off the table.

October Hike Odds Fell to 17% After Payrolls

The CME FedWatch Tool had priced a 70.9% chance of a quarter-point increase at the Oct. 27-28 meeting as of Sept. 29. Softer inflation and the two Fed speeches then crushed that figure. By Thursday the October hike probability was about 25%.

August PCE, the Fed’s preferred gauge, rose 3.4% year over year against a 3.7% forecast, the Bureau of Economic Analysis said. Core PCE, which strips food and energy, rose 3.0% against 3.3%. That print did more work than any single speech, and it followed an earlier CPI bounce that faded on hike odds when traders decided one cool reading was not a cycle turn.

OCTOBER MEETING ODDS ON CME FEDWATCH

  • Sept. 29: 70.9% chance of a 25 basis-point hike, 29.1% chance of a hold at 3.75% to 4.00%.
  • Thursday, Oct. 1: About a 25% chance of a hike after Williams, Jefferson, and the PCE report.
  • Friday after payrolls: 17% chance of a hike and an 83% chance the Fed leaves rates unchanged.

The September employment report, released Friday, was the last shove. FedWatch moved the hold to 83% from 72% before the print, and the hike to 17% from 28%. The 10-year Treasury yield eased a little from nearly 5.3%. That is friendlier for bitcoin than a 70.9% hike price. It is still a market that expects at least one more increase this year if inflation stays near Williams’s 3.5% path. Banks that shifted their call from October to December did not drop the extra hike. They moved it six weeks.

The SEC Opened a 60-Day Clock on Custody

Chairman Paul S. Atkins used Bitcoin by name in the statement that went out with the Oct. 1 proposal, and the coin caught a bid on the quote. He said that since Bitcoin’s arrival in 2008 the market had grown from a niche curiosity into a multi-trillion-dollar asset class, and that the plan would give advisers and funds a compliant pathway where none existed before.

The filing is Release IA-7023, a proposal, not a final rule. Comments run for 60 days after publication in the Federal Register. Advisers still cannot wake up on Monday and self-custody client bitcoin under a new safe harbor. The text is stricter than the headline.

WHAT THE CUSTODY PROPOSAL ACTUALLY ALLOWS

  • Self-custody test: An adviser may hold a client crypto asset only after finding that no permitted custodian is available, and it must repeat that finding every quarter.
  • Key control: Safeguarding systems must cover private keys and require joint authorization by at least two people for any transaction.
  • Segregation: Each client’s coins sit in addresses that hold only that client’s assets.
  • Outside check: An independent public accountant must report on custodial controls within six months of taking self-custody, then every year.
  • State trusts: State-chartered trust companies may act as crypto custodians if the adviser, after due inquiry, believes the firm is authorized for that work and reviews its audited accounts and control report each year.

The self-custody gate is built for coins no qualified shop will hold, the nascent and novel names the fact sheet calls out. Bitcoin is not that coin. Bank and trust custodians already take it. The live change for bitcoin, if the rule is adopted, is a clearer path for state trust companies to sit inside the permitted-custodian box, which matters for advisers who have been stuck doing a fact-specific “is this a bank?” analysis. That is a legal cleanup with a comment period. It is not a new buyer in the Oct. 2 session.

A $2.4 Billion Long Pile Sits Under $82,061

CoinGlass’s liquidation map is the piece of Friday that does not fit a victory lap. A drop through $82,061 would concentrate about $2.437 billion of long liquidations across major centralized exchanges. A break above $90,338 would concentrate about $1.185 billion of shorts. The downside stack is more than double the upside stack.

LIQUIDATION CLUSTERS ON MAJOR CEXS

Level Side that blows Estimated forced close
$82,061 Longs $2.437 billion
$90,338 Shorts $1.185 billion
Around $87,000 Asks (Glassnode) About half the old $85,000 wall

Traders who only watch the $122 million of shorts that died on the way to $86,857 are looking at spent fuel. The reload is the $2.3 billion of open interest that arrived as those shorts died, and the $2.437 billion of longs that sit under a level less than $5,000 below the post-spike tape. Thin asks above $85,000 can help a squeeze run. They do not cancel a long cluster that is twice the short cluster.

What the Half-Size Wall at $87,000 Does Now

Glassnode’s Friday note is the honest map. Sellers stepped aside, the $85,000 asks were partly filled and the rest pulled, and price ran into a smaller wall near $87,000. On a blank order book that is fuel. On a book that just added $2.3 billion of open interest, it is also a place where new shorts can lean and new longs can be trapped if the September jobs aftershock fades and December hike talk returns.

Spot demand is the tell that would settle the argument. One reply thread under Glassnode’s wall post pointed to spot cumulative volume delta rising while perpetual delta stayed flat, a pattern that would mean cash buyers, not levered longs, were doing the work. Farside’s Oct. 1 sheet does not yet match that picture at the product level. IBIT bought. The rest of the shelf sold. Until those lines travel together, Friday is a cleared wall and a squeeze, not a new bid.

The next cluster is half the old one, the Fed is more likely to sit in October, and Atkins put Bitcoin in an SEC sentence. The longs under $82,061 are still larger than the shorts over $90,338, and the ETF tape is still one fund deep.

Disclaimer: This article is news reporting and market analysis for information only. It is not investment advice, a solicitation to buy or sell bitcoin, spot bitcoin ETFs, futures, or any other crypto asset, and it is not a recommendation on Federal Reserve or SEC policy. Readers should consult a licensed financial adviser, and where custody or fund rules are in play a qualified securities lawyer or compliance officer, before making any investment or allocation decision. Prices, liquidation maps, ETF flows, and FedWatch probabilities reflect the cited figures on Oct. 2, 2026, and can change in the next session.

Harry is the editor and lead writer of CUMBERNAULD MEDIA, which he runs as an independent publication after a decade in journalism spent moving from reporting to editing. His habit is to open the document before the summary of it. A company result is read from the filing rather than the press release, a court or regulatory decision from the judgment itself, a scientific finding from the paper and its methods section rather than the headline claim, and a sporting sanction from the governing body's own ruling. That approach shapes coverage across news, business and technology as much as science, sports and entertainment, and it carries into the lifestyle, travel, auto and gaming pages, where product specifications are checked against the manufacturer's sheet and, where possible, against Harry's own testing. Every number is checked before publication, and where a source's figures are disputed the story says so. Corrections follow a public policy and are marked on the page. Readers anywhere in the world who write in get a reply from him, and the address is support@cumbernauld-media.com.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Trending