Ishan Crawford Brent crude fell 1.3% to $87.24 a barrel Tuesday, extending a slide that has now erased almost the entire spike touched off by the Israel-Iran-US war. US crude dropped 1.2% to $81.61. Both benchmarks had already tumbled more than 9% in the prior session, a reversal so sharp it wiped out a rally that pushed Brent above $100 just last week.
Traders are unwinding bets that the conflict would choke off Middle East crude exports, encouraged by talk of a Washington-Tehran opening. The ships that actually move that oil have not caught up to the trade yet.
Brent Slides to $87 as the Panic Trade Unwinds
The move marks one of the fastest reversals of the year in crude markets. Brent had briefly traded above $100 a barrel last week as fighting between Iran, Israel and the United States dragged on. Within two sessions, that entire premium was gone.
| Benchmark | Tuesday Price (01:23 GMT) | Tuesday Move | Monday’s Move | Recent Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brent Crude | $87.24 a barrel | Down 1.3% | Down more than 9% | Briefly above $100 last week |
| WTI Crude | $81.61 a barrel | Down 1.2% | Down more than 9% | Surged in tandem with Brent |
The trigger was straightforward: signs of de-escalation prompted traders to scale back bets that the conflict would severely disrupt global oil exports. What is less straightforward is whether the physical market backs up that bet, a question that grows more important the longer the selloff runs.
Trump’s Pause Gives Diplomacy One More Shot
Sentiment improved after President Donald Trump said Washington and Tehran were engaged in talks aimed at ending the conflict, following his decision to suspend further US strikes and give negotiations another opening. Iran halted its retaliatory attacks after the US pause. Reports also indicated China had been working behind the scenes to revive diplomatic contact between the two sides.
Tony Sycamore, a senior market analyst at IG, said the more than 9% selloff reflected growing confidence that an off-ramp to the conflict had emerged, easing immediate fears over attacks on Middle East energy infrastructure. He cautioned that the pause remains fragile. Markets, he said, are still waiting for concrete evidence of lasting diplomatic progress before fully pricing out geopolitical risk.
That caution is doing a lot of work. A pause is not a signed agreement. Iran and the United States tried a ceasefire once already this year, and it did not hold.
Thirteen Tankers a Day, Not Thirty-Three
Despite the improving mood in futures markets, Sycamore noted there has been little meaningful recovery in tanker traffic through the Strait of Hormuz, while flows through the Bab el-Mandeb Strait, the passage separating Yemen from the Horn of Africa that has carried a fraction of its normal volume since Houthi attacks began, also remain well below normal.
The scale of the disruption shows up in the shipping data. As recently as July 9, ship-tracking firm Kpler counted just 13 tankers crossing Hormuz in a single day, against an average of 33 a day the week before, according to CNBC. Government figures point the same direction: crude and petroleum liquids moving through Hormuz fell almost 30% year over year in the first quarter of 2026, dropping to 14.6 million barrels a day amid the Iran conflict, versus a 2025 average of 20 million barrels a day, according to the US Energy Information Administration. That 2025 baseline represents a quarter of global maritime oil trade, per Statista’s tracking of the route.
None of that shipping data has caught up to the price chart. Brent is down near where it traded before the war started; tanker traffic through the Gulf’s narrowest chokepoint is not. Sycamore said markets will be watching closely whether negotiations can deliver greater clarity over navigation through the strait, adding that any breakdown in talks would likely rebuild the risk premium in crude prices. Three things, by his account, would do that:
- A collapse in the Iran-Oman or broader US-Iran talks
- Renewed attacks on Saudi Arabian export infrastructure
- Continued failure of Hormuz and Bab el-Mandeb tanker traffic to recover toward normal levels
Any one of those would send the risk premium right back into the price.
Oman Quietly Holds the Pen on Hormuz
Negotiators from Iran and Oman are continuing talks aimed at restoring normal shipping through the strait, which normally carries around a fifth of global oil flows and has no practical alternative route for producers if it stays constrained. A successful agreement there could pave the way for broader US-Iran talks, though uncertainty over how durable the diplomatic pause proves keeps traders on edge.
Oman’s role is not new. The sultanate has served as a back channel between Washington and Tehran for more than a decade, a legacy of the region’s long history of quiet outside mediation shaping Gulf security arrangements, including a secret British-era deal that shaped the region. That history is part of why traders are watching Muscat as closely as Washington or Tehran this week.
How a 49% Spike Became a 9% Crash
The current selloff only makes sense against the whiplash of the past five months. Oil has swung from war premium to ceasefire relief to renewed conflict and back again, more than once.
- Feb. 28, 2026: The US and Israel launch strikes on Iran, opening a nine-day war that pushes Brent up 49%, past $100 a barrel.
- April 2026: Washington and Tehran agree to a conditional two-week ceasefire; Brent drops to $92.30 a barrel.
- Late June 2026: The ceasefire breaks down. Tit-for-tat US and Iranian strikes resume, reviving doubts about normal shipping through Hormuz.
- July 24, 2026: Rapidan Energy raises its fourth-quarter Brent forecast toward $100 a barrel, citing prolonged Middle East disruption, Bloomberg reported.
- Week of July 20, 2026: Brent briefly tops $100 a barrel again as fighting continues.
- Monday, July 27, 2026: Brent and WTI both tumble more than 9% after Trump pauses further US strikes and opens talks with Tehran.
- Tuesday, July 28, 2026: Brent extends the slide to $87.24 and WTI to $81.61.
A forecasting firm called for near-$100 oil through year end. Three days later, the market took nearly $13 off Brent in two sessions. That is not a knock on the forecaster so much as a measure of how fast this particular narrative can flip.
A Second Fault Line Opens in Kazakhstan
Markets also continued watching supply developments outside the Middle East. Kazakhstan’s main oil export terminal, run by the Caspian Pipeline Consortium near Novorossiysk on the Black Sea, resumed loadings on July 27 after Ukrainian drone attacks forced a shutdown. Four drone strikes over four days in mid-July hit tankers loading Kazakh crude at the terminal, and output there had more than halved before the consortium restarted accepting crude and loading vessels supplied by Tengizchevroil.
The Kazakhstan disruption has nothing to do with Iran. It is fallout from the Ukraine-Russia war reaching a pipeline network that has no connection to the Gulf conflict, yet it squeezed global crude supply during the same month oil markets were also pricing Middle East risk. Two unrelated wars, one shared effect on the same barrel count.
The de-escalation trade has already reached beyond crude. The Indian rupee posted a 28-paise bounce on truce hopes this week, one of several assets repricing Gulf risk lower in step with oil. Capital has kept moving into the region’s energy infrastructure regardless of the headlines. Engineering firm Wood recently landed a $17 million Middle Eastern petrochemical contract to cut emissions and boost efficiency at a regional plant, a sign the underlying investment case for Gulf energy has not frozen even as the war premium swings wildly around it.
Oman and Iran’s negotiators are due to keep talking this week, with progress on Hormuz navigation seen as the next real test of whether Monday’s pause becomes something more durable than April’s did.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why does the Strait of Hormuz matter so much to oil prices?
The strait is the only sea route out of the Persian Gulf for Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Kuwait, the United Arab Emirates and Qatar. It carried an average of 20 million barrels of crude and refined products a day in 2025, according to US government data, and producers have no practical alternative route if it stays constrained.
Are the Kazakhstan pipeline attacks part of the Iran conflict?
No. The drone strikes that hit tankers at the Caspian Pipeline Consortium terminal near Novorossiysk in mid-July stemmed from the Ukraine-Russia war, a separate conflict from the fighting involving Iran, Israel and the United States. Both cut into global crude supply during July even though the two wars share no connection.
Have the United States and Iran signed a ceasefire?
Not a formal one. Trump has paused further US strikes and Iran has halted retaliatory attacks, but no signed agreement is in place. An earlier ceasefire reached in April 2026 collapsed within weeks, which is why analysts are treating the current pause as fragile rather than final.
HDFC Bank Fines CEO Jagdishan Weeks Before Reappointment Call 
Zepto’s IPO Valuation Target Sinks to $3 Billion From $7 Billion 
Man Jailed Under a Rare Lifelong Order for Edinburgh Rape 
Tata Power’s ₹6,675 Crore Bet on Solar Self-Reliance in Odisha 
South Korea and Japan Chip Stocks Crash as China Surges 
Scotland’s Social Work Registration Overhaul Carries a Staffing Cost