How Britain’s secret deal shaped the Middle East

The Middle East is a region of turmoil, conflict and instability. The roots of its problems can be traced back to a century ago, when Britain and France secretly carved up the former Ottoman territories after World War I. This article explores how the Sykes-Picot Agreement and the Balfour Declaration shaped the fate of millions of people and the geopolitics of the region.

The Sykes-Picot Agreement: A colonial carve-up

In 1916, Britain and France agreed to divide the Middle East into spheres of influence, with a straight line from Acre to Kirkuk separating their zones. Russia, their ally, was also informed of the deal. The agreement was motivated by their strategic and economic interests, especially the oil resources of Iraq and Iran. The agreement ignored the aspirations of the Arab people, who had been promised independence by Britain in exchange for their support against the Ottoman Empire.

The Balfour Declaration: A promise to the Jews

In 1917, Britain issued a letter to Lord Rothschild, a leader of the British Jewish community, expressing its support for “the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people”. The letter, known as the Balfour Declaration, was intended to win the support of the Jewish population in Europe and America for the Allied war effort. The declaration also stated that nothing should be done to prejudice the rights of the existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, but this was largely ignored in practice.

sykes picot agreement map

The consequences: A legacy of conflict

The Sykes-Picot Agreement and the Balfour Declaration had far-reaching consequences for the Middle East. They led to the creation of artificial states with arbitrary borders, such as Iraq and Syria, that ignored the ethnic, religious and cultural diversity of the region. They also paved the way for the emergence of Zionism and Arab nationalism, two competing ideologies that clashed over the fate of Palestine. The British and French mandates over Palestine, Iraq, Syria and Lebanon were met with resistance and revolt by the local populations, who felt betrayed and oppressed by their colonial rulers.

The challenges: A quest for peace

The Middle East today is still haunted by the legacy of these secret deals. The region is plagued by wars, violence, terrorism, sectarianism, human rights violations and humanitarian crises. The Israeli-Palestinian conflict remains unresolved, despite decades of diplomatic efforts and international interventions. The Arab Spring uprisings of 2011 challenged the authoritarian regimes that emerged from the colonial era, but also unleashed new waves of instability and civil war. The rise of extremist groups such as ISIS exploited the power vacuum and the grievances of marginalized communities.

The future: A hope for change

The Middle East is not doomed to perpetual conflict and suffering. There are signs of hope and change in the region, such as the recent normalization of relations between Israel and some Arab states, the democratic transition in Sudan, the peace talks in Yemen and Libya, and the social movements for reform and justice in various countries. The region also has a rich history, culture and diversity that can be celebrated and preserved. The people of the Middle East deserve a better future than what was imposed on them by foreign powers a century ago.

By Ishan Crawford

Prior to the position, Ishan was senior vice president, strategy & development for Cumbernauld-media Company since April 2013. He joined the Company in 2004 and has served in several corporate developments, business development and strategic planning roles for three chief executives. During that time, he helped transform the Company from a traditional U.S. media conglomerate into a global digital subscription service, unified by the journalism and brand of Cumbernauld-media.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Posts