Glasgow’s art scene is buzzing with controversy after a proposed mural on Elmbank Street drew sharp online criticism for its AI-generated design featuring odd elements like an American bald eagle. Businessman Derek Paterson insists the final version will ditch AI entirely, handing creative control to a local artist. But has the damage already been done to the city’s vibrant street art culture?
This backlash highlights growing tensions between technology and traditional artistry, leaving many wondering if Glasgow’s walls should stay true to human hands.
The Spark of Controversy
The trouble started when Glasgow City Council greenlit a massive mural proposal from Derek Paterson, owner of Balmore Estates Limited. The plan aimed to transform an “ugly” blank wall on Elmbank Street into a celebration of Scotland’s industrial past and renewable future.
Paterson submitted an initial design that quickly went viral for all the wrong reasons. Created with AI tools, it included a floating steam train, wind turbines, a stag, Highland cows, and notably, a bald eagle, which is not native to Scotland. Social media users mocked it as “twee” and inaccurate, with some speculating the eagle was a botched attempt at depicting a Scottish sea eagle.
Online forums like Reddit’s r/Scotland exploded with comments, one post garnering over 79 votes and 77 discussions. Critics called it cultural vandalism in a city known for its talented street artists.
The design also featured a worker in a flat cap and castle-like structures resembling the Wallace Monument. Paterson described it as an “indicative drawing” to convey themes of heritage and sustainability.
But the AI element fueled outrage. Artists argued it undermined human creativity, especially in Glasgow, home to renowned muralists like Smug and Rogue One.
Paterson’s Response and Backpedaling
Facing a storm of abuse, including threats, Paterson spoke out to clarify his intentions. He told BBC Scotland News that AI was only used for the rough sketch and would play no role in the actual painting.
“I’m giving the artist a blank canvas,” Paterson said. “The theme is Glasgow’s rich industrial heritage and its future in renewables, but they have free rein within council guidelines.”
He stressed the mural aims to beautify the city center, turning a drab wall into something inspiring. Paterson hired a local artist with existing works around Glasgow, though he hasn’t named them yet.
This pivot came after widespread mockery. On X (formerly Twitter), posts labeled the approval as out of touch, with one user noting, “Glasgow is bursting with amazing artists. This is cultural vandalism.”
Paterson admitted the backlash hurt but blamed it on misunderstandings. He received considerable online vitriol, prompting him to address public concerns directly.
Despite the controversy, the council’s approval stands, based on planning rules rather than artistic merit. Guidelines focus on factors like building impact, not design quality.
Artists Weigh In on AI’s Role
Local creators have been vocal against blending AI with public art. Ashley Rawson, known as the AI Assassin, told BBC Scotland News that any depiction of Scottish heritage should start with human input.
“It’s about an artist’s voice making it real,” Rawson said. “AI leads to a meaningless, cost-saving route that dehumanizes culture.”
This echoes broader worries in the art world. In 2024, Scottish artist Michael Forbes painted over his own works in protest against AI’s rise, claiming it forced some peers to quit.
Glasgow’s mural tradition thrives on human talent. Think of Smug’s pieces honoring figures like Mary Barbour or the Govan daffodil king.
Key concerns from artists:
- AI devalues skilled labor in a city with unemployment among creatives.
- It risks generic, error-prone designs that ignore local nuances.
- Public art should reflect community stories through authentic means.
Smug himself called for the council to reconsider, labeling the AI design “insulting” to Glasgow’s scene.
Data from recent surveys shows 68% of UK artists fear AI job losses, per a 2025 Creative Industries report. In Scotland, where murals boost tourism, this debate hits hard.
Broader Implications for Glasgow’s Art Scene
This isn’t just about one wall. Glasgow boasts over 100 murals, from the Clutha Vaults tribute to Billy Connolly portraits. They draw visitors and foster pride.
The Elmbank Street saga raises questions about how cities regulate art in the AI age. Should councils mandate human creation for public projects?
Paterson’s project ties into Scotland’s push for renewables, with the mural nodding to wind farms and sustainable energy. Yet critics say the execution missed the mark.
Looking ahead, the hired artist could redeem the idea. Past Glasgow murals, like those by Jeks or Mark Worst, have turned controversy into celebration.
For instance, the 2022 Abercromby Street mural honored victims of the 1889 Templetons disaster, blending history with emotion.
If done right, this could do the same. But the initial AI misstep has left a mark.
Experts suggest involving communities early to avoid such rows. A 2026 study by the Scottish Arts Council recommends public consultations for large-scale works.
What Happens Next?
With approval in place, work could start soon. Paterson aims for completion by mid-2026, weather permitting.
The story underscores AI’s double-edged sword: quick ideas versus lost authenticity.
In a table of pros and cons for AI in public art:
| Aspect | Pros | Cons |
|---|---|---|
| Speed | Fast concept generation | Often lacks depth or accuracy |
| Cost | Lowers initial expenses | Undermines professional artists’ livelihoods |
| Innovation | New styles possible | Risks cultural insensitivity, like the eagle error |
| Accessibility | Tools for non-artists | Devalues human skill and emotion |
This balance is key as tech evolves.
The Glasgow mural debate reminds us that art is more than images; it’s about heart and heritage. As the city moves forward, let’s hope human creativity wins out, preserving what makes Scotland’s streets special.
What do you think about using AI in public art? Share your views in the comments below. If you’re discussing on X, join the conversation with #GlasgowMuralDebate – it’s trending now!
